All publications

Original Article · 2023

Robotic ureteral reconstruction for recurrent strictures after prior failed management

Lee M, Lee Z, Houston N, Strauss D, Lee R, Asghar AM, Corse T, Zhao LC, Stifelman MD, Eun DD, Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery (CORRUS)

BJUI compass · 2023

PubMed DOI PMID 37025480

Citation

Lee M, Lee Z, Houston N, Strauss D, Lee R, Asghar AM, Corse T, Zhao LC, Stifelman MD, Eun DD; Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery (CORRUS). Robotic ureteral reconstruction for recurrent strictures after prior failed management. BJUI Compass. 2023 Feb 16;4(3):298-304. doi: 10.1002/bco2.224. PMID: 37025480; PMCID: PMC10071084.

Abstract

To describe our multi-institutional experience with robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) in patients who failed prior endoscopic and/or surgical management. We retrospectively reviewed our Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery (CORRUS) database for all consecutive patients who underwent RUR between 05/2012 and 01/2020 for a recurrent ureteral stricture after having undergone prior failed endoscopic and/or surgical repair. Post-operatively, patients were assessed for surgical success, defined as the absence of flank pain and obstruction on imaging. Overall, 105 patients met inclusion criteria. Median stricture length was 2 (IQR 1-3) centimetres. Strictures were located at the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) (41.0%), proximal (14.3%), middle (9.5%) or distal (35.2%) ureter. There were nine (8.6%) radiation-induced strictures. Prior failed management included endoscopic intervention (49.5%), surgical repair (25.7%) or both (24.8%). For repair of UPJ and proximal strictures, ureteroureterostomy (3.4%), ureterocalicostomy (5.2%), pyeloplasty (53.5%) or buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty (37.9%) was utilized; for repair of middle strictures, ureteroureterostomy (20.0%) or buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty (80.0%) was utilized; for repair of distal strictures, ureteroureterostomy (8.1%), side-to-side reimplant (18.9%), end-to-end reimplant (70.3%) or appendiceal bypass (2.7%) was utilized. Major (Clavien >2) post-operative complications occurred in two (1.9%) patients. At a median follow-up of 15.1 (IQR 5.0-30.4) months, 94 (89.5%) cases were surgically successful. RUR may be performed with good intermediate-term outcomes for patients with recurrent strictures after prior failed endoscopic and/or surgical management.

Key Points

  • Published in BJUI compass in 2023.
  • Indexed in PubMed as PMID 37025480.
  • Mapped to Ureteral Reconstruction, Urethral Stricture & Urethroplasty, Robotic & Single-Port.
  • Abstract available from PubMed and rendered as static text on this page.

Clinical Relevance

This work sits within Dr. Zhao's upper urinary tract reconstruction bibliography, including robotic ureteral repair, buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty, reimplantation, pyeloplasty failure, and complex salvage reconstruction.

Related Publications