All publications

Original Article · 2022

External Genital Revisions after Gender-Affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: Surgical Assessment, Techniques, and Outcomes

Dy GW, Salibian AA, Blasdel G, Zhao LC, Bluebond-Langner R

Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2022

PubMed DOI PMID 35426889

Citation

Dy GW, Salibian A, Blasdel G, Zhao LC, Bluebond-Langner R. External Genital Revisions after Gender-Affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: Surgical Assessment, Techniques, and Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 15. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009165. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35426889.

Abstract

Following gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty or vulvoplasty, patients may seek vulvar revision procedures for a variety of common aesthetic and functional concerns. These indications for revision and accompanying techniques are not well-described in the literature. Patients who underwent vulvar revision surgery at the authors' institution were identified, and patient demographics, surgical indications, operative details, and complications were described. Common complaints requiring external genital revision were sorted into four categories: clitoral, labial, introital, and urethral. Thirty-five patients with a history of vaginoplasty underwent vulvar revision between May of 2017 and December of 2019. The mean age at surgical correction was 38.9 years. Ten patients (28.6 percent) had undergone prior secondary procedures (range, 1 to 3). Mean follow-up after revision surgery was 10.7 ± 8.7 months (range, 0 to 30.6 months). The majority of patients underwent concurrent revisions in multiple "categories". Labial aesthetic concerns were most common (n = 27, 77.1 percent), followed by clitoral (n = 20, 57.1 percent), urologic (n = 17, 48.6 percent), and introital complaints (n = 12, 34.3 percent). Twelve patients (34.3 percent) had canal stenosis requiring concurrent robot-assisted canal revision with peritoneal flaps. Complications included labial abscess (n = 1) and deep vein thrombosis (n = 1). Three patients (8.6 percent) underwent subsequent external genital revisions. Management approaches and surgical techniques for each of these common revision categories are provided. As more individuals seek vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty, surgeons must be prepared to address a range of common aesthetic and functional complaints requiring vulvar revision. Therapeutic, IV.

Key Points

  • Published in Plastic and reconstructive surgery in 2022.
  • Indexed in PubMed as PMID 35426889.
  • Mapped to Urethral Stricture & Urethroplasty, Gender-Affirming Surgery, Robotic & Single-Port.
  • Abstract available from PubMed and rendered as static text on this page.

Clinical Relevance

This publication supports a focused body of work on gender-affirming surgery, including patient-centered outcomes, robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty, complications, revisions, and measurement of surgical quality.

Related Publications